Top-Secret White House Chat Breach Sparks Outrage and Tensions
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg made a shocking revelation: he was accidentally added to a top-secret White House Signal chat discussing military plans for an upcoming strike on Yemen. The chat, which was supposed to be highly confidential, included 18 senior officials, including Vice President JC Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and CIA Director Tulsi Gabbard.
A Mistaken Inclusion in a Sensitive Chat
Goldberg described how National Security Adviser Mike Waltz started the conversation on Signal, a secure messaging app. The chat was meant to be a private discussion of military operations, but Goldberg, a respected journalist, was mistakenly added. This included sensitive details about the strike, such as targets, weapons, and the sequence of attacks. Goldberg claimed that Hegseth shared specifics of the military plan in the chat just hours before the attack on March 15.
Hegseth Fires Back
Upon learning of the breach, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth wasted no time criticizing Goldberg’s credibility. Hegseth, calling Goldberg a “highly discredited so-called journalist,” slammed The Atlantic for its coverage of Trump-related issues. He accused Goldberg of spreading false information, labeling him a “deceitful” journalist who “peddles in garbage.”
Hegseth was quick to dismiss the suggestion that he shared “war plans” in the group, emphasizing that no classified operational details had been leaked. However, Goldberg stood by his claims, telling CNN’s Kaitlan Collins that Hegseth was indeed texting attack plans in the group chat.
Pete Hegseth, when asked about the monumental fuck up of including the editor of the Atlantic in a top secret chat room, elects to attack The Atlantic, instead of answering the question.
Absolutely disqualifying and makes him sound imbecilic.
pic.twitter.com/e5ttbi3FDk— Turnbull (@cturnbull1968) March 24, 2025
The Fallout and Security Concerns
The breach has sparked widespread outrage among lawmakers and security experts. Senator Jack Reed described the incident as “stunning and dangerous,” warning that such lapses in security could put American lives at risk. Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker also expressed concern, suggesting that mistakes had been made and promising to investigate the matter further.
Goldberg expressed his anger and anxiety over the “sloppiness” of the security breach, stressing that American service personnel were directly involved in the strike, not just standoff weapons. He also joked about the potential disaster, saying, “They’re lucky they didn’t send this to a Houthi by mistake or a foreign diplomat.”
The Implications and Accountability
As the situation continues to unfold, the central question remains: how could such a major security lapse occur? The scandal has raised serious concerns about operational security within the White House and military leadership, leaving many wondering whether anyone will be held accountable for this dangerous mistake.
With President Trump’s team already on the defensive, the repercussions of this breach could have far-reaching consequences for those involved.
